Richard White, "Spiritual Philosophers: From Schopenhauer to Irigaray."
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Objections to hospital philosophers.
Like morally sensitive hospital staff, philosophers resist routine simplification of morally complex cases. Like hospital clergy, they favour reflective and principled decision-making. Like hospital lawyers, they refine and extend the language we use to formulate and defend our complex decisions. But hospital philosophers are not redundant: they have a wider range of principles and categories a...
متن کاملCompassion in Schopenhauer and Śāntideva
Although it is well known that Schopenhauer claimed that Buddhism closely reflected his own philosophy, this claim was largely ignored until the mid-late Twentieth century. Most commentators on Schopenhauer (with some recent exceptions) since then have mentioned his Buddhist affinities but have been quite broad and general in their treatment. I feel that any general comparison of Schopenhauer’s...
متن کاملRichard Mulligan: from skeptic to true believer
For most people, the trip from the Whitehead Institute at MIT (the Massachusetts Institute of Technology) to Harvard Medical School is a two-mile bus ride. For Richard Mulligan, who late last year became the first director of the Harvard Gene Therapy Initiative, it seems like a voyage to a new world. It is daunting enough that Mulligan had to move from the MIT’s ‘research is all that counts’ at...
متن کاملNotes on Schopenhauer and the Natural Sciences
The following notes were prepared in response to criticism of Schopenhauer’s philosophy in a mailing list. The impression given was that the advances of the natural sciences since his death make his work irrelevant to modern science. I for one do not think that this is true. In these notes I do not try to convince the reader otherwise but select few examples of important scientists that were in...
متن کاملExpecting Moral Philosophers to be Reliable ∗
Are philosophers’ intuitions more reliable than philosophical novices’? Are we entitled to assume the superiority of philosophers’ intuitions just as we assume that experts in other domains have more reliable intuitions than novices? Ryberg raises some doubts and his arguments promise to undermine the expertise defence of intuition-use in philosophy once and for all. In this paper, I raise a nu...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Philosophy in Review
سال: 2020
ISSN: 1206-5269,1920-8936
DOI: 10.7202/1074037ar